"Riley's 2005 Manhattan Project"                           
<> Answering today's $64,000 dollar question: Can a <>                          
large grouping of scientists save Mankind from Energy Gluttony?!                        
(or will it take God working thru One Man?) 10/30/2005                         

Manhattan Project Gif Files of October 30, 2005 Post:
 
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789a_canalargegroupofscientistsworktogethersavemankindfromenergydepletion.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789b_singleneedturnedintoneedforhydraheadedgoupthink.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789c_smartpeoplesuccumbingtolureofimaginarygroup.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789d_1manthinktankfollowsgodssacrednumber4.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789e_howoneinventorcanbeat4scientists.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789f_einsteinheisenbergcopenhagen4tearscompromise.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789g_arthurcatholicviewofcorruptioninnumbers.gif
http://www.newpath4.com/01manhattanproject20056789h_curseofthenumbers.gif
 
All above gifs on 1 webpage > newpath4.com/manhattanprojectrileysolvedalloftheabove2005gifrecord.htm
 
Environment > http://tinyurl.com/8af4s
Next Human Evolution > http://tinyurl.com/cyqph
Surviving the next Ice Age > http://tinyurl.com/cgo3a
      up in Planet (Earth) Alaska > http://tinyurl.com/axb3p
99% newpath4 links on this page > http://tinyurl.com/8p7r3
Finding the Electric Space Engine &
      Finding the locked box > http://tinyurl.com/a5fvy
 
Galaxies are Visible Dimensionshttp://tinyurl.com/eyf8b
Crude Oil Challenge > http://tinyurl.com/bhdgd
Life After the Crude Oil Crash > http://tinyurl.com/aecgz
Hurricanes are from God? http://tinyurl.com/8p7r3
Proving Good with Evil > http://tinyurl.com/99rst
New World Engines > http://www.newpath4.com/paget6.htm
Search Engine Fast & Easy > http://tinyurl.com/4txmk
 
 
 
 Full Text below (as gifs above) as originally posted 10/30/2005
 
Carollee is a very nice name. It shows thoughtfulness and love of parents to
think of a new name for their new child. It looks like they wanted a baby girl
but they were also torn and wanted a boy too, so they took "Carol" & added
a boy's name? Lee? How wonderful a name that is. They received a girl and
they wanted her to be strong too. They wanted her to make
a mark as wide as could be...

And something else. They wanted people to have to THINK
when they would write her name! hahahaha When my 2nd was
growing up a few people wanted to start tagging him "Bill".
I nipped it in the bud right there. I equated the shorter version
of William to be a name would roll off people's tongue so easy he
would be a shadow in this World. To me, his fate would be my own;
as "Woody" -as I had always answered to- had seemed to make me a shadow.
On the other hand, everyone had called my Dad "Marshall".
Many people respected Dad. So I equated naming a child with
being tantamount to determining the child's fate to a certain extent.

There's a name floating around; Manhattan Project. It's only been used once.
It is a good name *but* can that name be used successfully a 2nd time?!
Sure it could. Unfortunately, in using the name over it causes
everyone who hears it to think certain things. "Manhattan Project"
conjures up ideas of a GROUP of smart men working TOGETHER
to solve a very large problem:

Stopping Hitler's machine then {} stopping Energy Depletion now.

By using the term "Manhattan Project" everyone is channeled & funneled to
AUTOMATICALLY ACCEPT that a "GROUP" has to solve the world energy problem.
Ordinarily I'd agree with that premise but since I've been a one-man THINK TANK
working independently, having come up with many answers, usage of the M.P. term
serves to turn the public, the bankers, the everybody (government) starts to doubting
that one person could solve the massive complex of energy (& pollution) problems.

The awesome hideousness of naming something by a former name raises
its mighty juggernaut head high in the air like a 10-headed Hydra that
can ONLY BE DEFEATED by 20 ARNOLD-HERCULES working harmoniously together.


Thus we read an editorial in my local paper this morning (Click for Full Reprint below):
where a world traveler, engineer, Leader of Men:
"Bill Mashburn, of Blacksburg, is a professor emeritus, mechanical engineering,
and former Director of the Energy Management Institute at Virginia Tech..."
[IN OTHER WORDS EVERYTHING WOODROW RILEY WAS NOT, IS NOT, WILL NEVER BE].

Bill starts his article saying we need another Manhattan Project, which is SINGULAR;
by article's end he has altered the phrase to imply need of a "People-Plural" solution
:

"The strategic plan developed
by such a Manhattan-type energy GROUP
should be given wide dissemination so all
PEOPLE will have an understanding of the implications and
MAGNITUDE of such an effort. Tough decisions and sacrifices
will have to be made in many cases. With such a document, elected
OFFICIALS would have solid information as a basis for legislation to meet
OUR energy requirements. It may require a reorientation of some elected
OFFICIALS to be less controlled by political and vested interest influences so
THEY will have the courage & long-range vision necessary for the welfare of our country."


By turning everyone's face toward this IMAGINARY GROUP any individual is going
to be overlooked. This smart, smart, smart man writes a smart, smart, smart
editorial that "turns the herd" toward an imaginary Manhattan Group
who supposedly is oh God OUR ONLY HOPE. Who will stand?
All the King's horses and all the King's men ride through
Bill's City Gates in anticipation of greeting their Group. If any one person
had any one answer, no one would hear of it because of the one being
smothered by the suits, the credentials, the PhD's & the white coats...

Naming a child, naming a brainchild, is very important.
Take the name of my website: newpath4. I had to name it
SOMETHING! hahaha I couldn't call it Untitled then come back
later and change it! I had to name it so I could pay a host
to hold the files for access. I had to pay a year forward.
My first site I named "AskInventor". The name just sort of popped into
my head. In hindsight I can see I was really telling the world:
"If you have a problem, Ask an Inventor!".

After I named newpath4.info a number of people seemed to think I was
setting up a NEW RELIGION in opposition to every existing religion, so a
number of people saw the name and avoided it like it was Satan Incarnate,
thinking I was seeking Fame & Glory outside God's Truth.
No matter how many places I call my engines "God's Engines"
some people may still want to think the bad thoughts over the good.
And why not? I am after all just one person. A new Hitler? Stalin? Mussolini?
Why, I put my picture on my last webpage! http://tinyurl.com/ax7jd ,
so obviously I'm suffering from DELUSIONS of GRANDEUR.
hahahaha Oh yeah, and I laugh a lot so that REALLY makes me look
Guilty. Most of you guys here see thru all this muck. You have
quoted Jesus' words: "By their fruits you will know them."
Or was that Paul's words? Well, doesn't take a prophet to say it.

So hindsight kicks in eventually and tells me the number 4 is a
sacred number. 4 corners of God's Temple? God's chariot goes all
directions accompanied by 4 angels? Associating my website with a
spiritual number & spiritual themes makes me more invisible
than a Klingon's cloaking device! hahaha Am I complaining? NO. Anything
I have achieved is because God saved me so I could get it done. It was "His Will"
being done on His Earth, that NO ONE of his children (the entire human family)
should die from lack of electricity. God uses me to do His Will; which is?
Using me to show a small shadow of what He plans to do: Psalms 37:11 >>>
http://bibletools.org//index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/14462/eVerseID/14462/version/amp/opt/parallel/RTD/cgg

But if I had made a website like all the rest (99.99%) that uses
a set template and erases any mention of "God" from its pages, I'm
convinced I would not have been "given" nor "seen" how to make these
engines work. They simply are not "my" engines! But most surfers
don't look that deep... They see my name is in some of my page filenames
& my picture & my "showy display" (http://tinyurl.com/a4zd4 , "lust of/for the eyes")
and determine for themselves that I am obviously opposed to God, having shown myself
to be a "part of this world" which of course in vs 17 next says I'M PASSING AWAY.
Not much surprise there. We're all passing away, some more than others.

Naming choices are very important. A circle is made of incalculable numbers but the
square made from 4 points on that circle gives us a square, a good, old-fashioned,
Jack-in-th'-Box square old fogie one-man think tank who I might add
NO ONE WOULD SEE IF I DIDN'T PLASTER MY PIC, NAME, INCESSANT BLOG POSTS
ALL OVER THE PLACE BECAUSE I DIDN'T ATTEND THEIR SCHOOLS.
Those people who get past all those "obstacles", see
"my" engines in spite of the World's Leaders pointing you
to remain on this side of the Red Sea & try to work with Pharoah,
are truly Blessed.

Blessed "active" not Blessed "passive". You "Bless Yourselves"
by opening your heart to the possibility of a one-man inventor,
working alone with a Bible at his side. hehheh
Moses didn't part the Sea; God did.
Today's "Pharoah" owns the airwaves,
blaring forth it didn't happen because
it can't happen & it won't never happen.

What if "it" has happened? THAT Will Smith, THAT is the question.
The question everyone else avoids because the herd is being led the
wrong way, looking for a HARMONIOUSLY-GREASED BODY OF INDEPENDENT
THINKERS WHO WILL MIRACULOUSLY WORK TOGETHER AS A SINGLE PROBLEM-SOLVING UNIT.

Hutchison points out how utterly illogical it is for Americans to expect such a
MIRACLE GROUP to suddenly appear and solve our Energy/Pollution Dilemma >>>
http://www.renewamerica.us/analyses/051029hutchison.htm :

"Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger, the four greatest pioneers of nuclear physics of the twentieth century, had met together and come up with a paradoxical and problematical compromise at Copenhagen. Were these great men guessing? Were they papering over an incurable conflict between Heisenberg and Schrödinger? Were they so dazzled with Schrödinger's mathematics that they were blind to the laboratory evidence? Was viewing radiation as both particles and waves a logical contradiction?

The 26-year-old upstart Heisenberg was reduced to tears, as he argued with the three great men of physics, all of them exalted by fame and all old enough to be his father. Was he cowed into submission? Did the sullen Heisenberg and the dubious Einstein foreshadow a rocky future for Quantum Mechanics? Yes. Quantum Mechanics has been in an uproar ever since the Copenhagen compromise, and has fallen into quarreling factions. Scientists still cannot agree whether light is a particle, a wave, or both."


So, Like it or Don't Like it, our own History points
to a small number that would come up with "The Answer".
It might be one, two, or three. Three men invented the transistor.
Four men were reduced to tears trying to reach an agreement.

YOU get 4 Bill Mashburns together, What do you have?!
Four Bill Mashburns carrying 4 professor emeritus titles.
Alright. There weren't 4 Hercules, there weren't 4 Samsons.
And there sure aren't 4 of me. Maybe that's part of the answer.
Why is the number 4 sacred with God
but a group of men disintegrates before it?
A man's ego can't stand being reduced past 33%?


On Sunday, October 30, 2005, the answer isn't 40 scientists.
It wasn't yesterday, it won't be tomorrow,
and certainly not be "The Day After Tomorrow"!

                                           Originally posted on http://www.renewamerica.us
251.  Woodrow Riley > http://tinyurl.com/a5fvy - Roanoke, VA - Posted on Oct 30, 2005, at 08:40:16 am Central Time

 

The Cost of Corruption and Red Tape:
 
Post by Arthur Martin (partial quote)
RenewAmerica Forum,
Moral principles

The recently published Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
had something to say on corruption and red tape.

(WOODY, TAKE NOTE)
*Several numbers note corruption as an obstacle to economic development.*
And, in the context of political systems, the Compendium, in No. 411, describes
corruption as a betrayal of both moral principles and the norms of social justice.

"Corruption radically distorts the role of representative institutions, because they become
an arena for political bartering between clients' requests and governmental services,"
notes the Compendium. The following number deals with excessive bureaucratization,
noting that it causes institutions to lose their effectiveness.

The Compendium proposes a solution to these problems based on moral principles rather than
on international agreements. Instead of over-regulation, it suggests that public administration be
oriented by the idea of the state being at the service of citizens. The state is a steward of the
people's resources and should administer them with a view to ensuring the common good
.

A similar recommendation is given for those in political power, notes No. 410. They should
remember that "responsible authority" means "authority exercised with those virtues that
make it possible to put power into practice as service." Such advice could prove to be good business, too.
ZE05102901

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The World is the seed of the Serpent (Gen. 3:15) and by its nature is corrupt. Jesus came to
free us from sin and corruption by living the Divine Life that He gave to us at so great a cost to
Himself. Until we "Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness....
(Matt 6:33) we will NOT have justice upon the earth.

http://www.catholic-church.org/ejtyler/SocialDoctrineCompendium.html

252.  Arthur Martin - Tampa, Florida - Posted on Oct 30, 2005, at 10:24:37 am Central Time
_____________________________________________________
Arthur #252; corruption from too many people
Yep. The first plural group -Adam & Eve- failed.
Three men made the transistor, 4 men ended in disgust,
Heisenberg splitting off to join the Nazis.
It all points to men needing ONE *GOD* at the helm.
But for some reason the next odd number (3) succeeded.
When we get a little further up in numbers like a baseball team,
hockey team, football team, the individual members are able
to shelve their innate desires to be super-achieving individuals.
The Rockettes are many & they succeed. Large numbers of floats
in a Easter Parade or Rose Bowl parade pretty much succeed.
But they all accept their "Fate" whereas a group of
learned men or politicians break down into tears,
some falling into corruption.

Good post Arthur. It seems the best way to overcome this
"numbers curse" is if all the parties share a devotion to God.

And that is where we get down to the
nitty-gritty difference between a man of God versus
the atheist/agnostic/humanist/philanthropist failed philosophies,
because all the others -thinking they can replace God with "Works"-
will usually "lowest denominator out" into a race to the bank.

253.  Woodrow Riley > http://tinyurl.com/4txmk - Posted on Oct 30, 2005, at 10:43:44 am Central Time

**************************************************************

Full copy of Times Post:

Bill Mashburn - Esteemed Author, wrote this:

Mashburn, of Blacksburg, is a Professor Emeritus, mechanical engineering, and former Director of the Energy Management Institute at Virginia Tech.

The security and economy of nations of the world literally float on oil. No other single resource can have as much impact. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor to destroy our fleet, which could have blocked Japan's oil imports from Indonesia. During World War II, we had a strategic plan to take over the Middle East oil if necessary.

In 1973, because of our support of Israel, OPEC instigated an oil embargo against the United States. In 1979, there was a perceived 5 percent shortage of the production of oil. Oil companies panicked and started purchasing and filling every empty tank on land and sea. The price per barrel of oil nearly doubled overnight -- with just a 5 percent oil shortage.

The recent hurricanes in the Gulf damaged both supply and refining capacity, sending gasoline prices soaring.

We put both blame and expectations on our elected officials to solve the security and economic problems caused by these interruptions. The solutions, however, are the most complex of any ever to face our nation. The Department of Energy has been effective, but its efforts have been fragmented as far as a long-range strategic plan is concerned. It has failed, so far, to develop a nuclear waste depository, which it was assigned to do in the '90s and is necessary for further development of nuclear power plants.

National energy policies developed by previous administrations do not provide the comprehensive long-range strategy for energy security. Political and environmental issues have dominated. It is too much to expect elected officials alone to have the necessary skills to develop and implement a strategic plan that has so many economic, political and technical components. But we are now at a point in history where we need to draw a hard line and make tough decisions.

What is needed is a Manhattan-type project to study and develop a workable long-range strategic energy plan. The Manhattan Project, established early in WWII, had as its objective the development of a nuclear weapon before our enemies developed one. Top experts were identified, isolated and given the resources needed to accomplish their objective. The same should be done with energy. There are individuals in this country who have the knowledge and skills, and if isolated from political and vested interests, could develop such a plan.

The plan should, as a minimum, address the following issues: available resources, both domestic and foreign; alternative fuels; industrial, commercial, institutional and residential usage; transportation; regulation of energy resources; and, last but not least, an intensive energy education program for all levels.

Each domestic and foreign energy resource used by this country should be identified as to present and projected capacity, economic and political stability, and with a contingency plan that could be implemented immediately when and if any of the resources dropped out. Our delay in making decisions once a resource is lost due to hurricanes, war or embargoes causes confusion and economic loss.

There are many alternative energy sources just waiting in the wings for either further technical development or for energy prices to rise enough to provide economic justification. These include the oil sands of Canada, solar and wind energy, hydrogen fuels, fuel cells, coal and many more.

The government has, in the past, attempted to support development and commercialization of some of these technologies, such as solar. They failed to fully evaluate all influencing factors, such as the continued low cost of electric energy, so many of the projects are still in the wings.

We are the Saudi Arabia of coal, but clean-burning technologies should be further developed and implemented.

Within the past 20 years, every new power plant coming on line has been fueled by natural gas because it burns cleaner than other fossil fuels. This is a major reason natural gas costs will continue to be higher for residential heating and other natural gas uses.

Nuclear energy is now being proposed. Previously, each nuclear plant built had its own unique design, which made safety issues difficult to define and implement. Designs are now being standardized as was done in France -- which is now 70 percent nuclear -- so safety will be much improved. All alternative energy sources should be evaluated for both technical and economic feasibility and then put in a priority order for implementation.

Industry, commercial and public institutions have done reasonably well in their efforts to use energy efficiently. In my previous work with energy survey teams, we determined the major problem in most was the lack of a proper internal organizational structure to manage energy. We found, almost without exception, employees wanted to save energy, but simply didn't know how. These groups have come a long way, but many dollars are still being left on the table.

Transportation is a major component of our energy usage. It would be very expensive and disruptive to change. Our interstate system, built by the Eisenhower administration primarily for defense purposes, has diverted products previously hauled by rail to trucks. It has made personal travel much more accessible by automobile, making larger ones more desirable for comfort and safety.

Could the long line of trucks now plowing along on our interstate system be replaced with rail? And if so, would the general public feel safe enough to again drive smaller cars? When I was a child, an electric-powered street car ran through the heart of the city. It was bought out and closed down by one of the automotive companies. Corporate power and individual freedoms would be the greatest challenge to any significant changes to the transportation system.

Improved efficiency in the residential segment is impeded by two factors: lack of knowledge and lack of resources. Few homeowners have a good concept of priorities for reducing energy. Many think turning out lights will save lots of energy. On a pie chart showing energy usage in a residence, lighting comes under "other." For example, if a 100 watt light bulb is allowed to be on for 10 hours, the kilowatt hour usage would be 1000 or 1kW-hr, which has an average residential cost of only 8 cents. Many know heat pumps are the most efficient way to heat and cool a home, but don't have the financial resources to install one.

Deregulation of many previously regulated industries has been detrimental to the industry, to the public and to the energy conservation effort. When the trucking industry became deregulated, more trucks came on the road, many with unsafe equipment, especially brakes. Deregulation of the electric industry has simply turned it over to corporate greed -- example: Enron and California. The recent blackout that started in Ohio was caused by a deregulated company not having proper safety equipment. Many corporations have a "risk analysis" department where, in many cases, they determine it is more economical to take a risk and pay for collateral damage than to implement safety features.

The claim for deregulation was that costs would go down. Six years ago, I was part of a study mission with the Association of Energy Engineers that met with key energy officials in several of the Northern European countries, which were the first to deregulate their electric industry. In none of the countries visited were electric energy costs reduced as a result of deregulation. Residential electrical costs are expected to rise in every part of the United States when deregulation occurs, along with a decrease in reliability.

A comprehensive energy educational program should be developed and instigated for all levels -- CEOs, managers, employees and homeowners. Two programs have been providing intensive training for energy managers in industry, commerce and government for the past 20 years. These are the Certified Energy Manager program conducted by the Association of Engineers, and the Energy Management Diploma program, which I started in 1978 and is now being conducted by North Carolina State University. Certification from either of these two programs is recognized by the federal government for government employees designated as energy managers.

I have conducted a workshop in the Energy Management Diploma program for more than 20 years, and have always asked the same question: "What are the barriers to your energy management program?" The answer has always been the same -- lack of top management support and lack of funding. Our efforts to involve top management in training have been less than successful. Their training and interest seem to be more oriented to the bottom line. Our colleges of business should be providing energy management training to their students who may someday become operational managers and CEOs.

The strategic plan developed by such a Manhattan-type energy group should be given wide dissemination so all people will have an understanding of the implications and magnitude of such an effort. Tough decisions and sacrifices will have to be made in many cases. With such a document, elected officials would have solid information as a basis for legislation to meet our energy requirements. It may require a reorientation of some elected officials to be less controlled by political and vested interest influences so they will have the courage and long-range vision necessary for the welfare of our country.

 

~~~~~~~~~   End of Article   ~~~~~~~~~ 

 

You have read articles like that one before. Pick up any newspaper or magazine, one of them will have cries & wringing of hands complete with sweaty-palmed excited cries for a new "Manhattan Project". I can tell you how these cries <cries for more of YOUR money> are very false!

THERE'S AN ENERGY CRISIS?! 
Where ??? I solved HALF of it (50%) in 1990!

No one told you? Yep. I submitted plans to the U.S. Department of Energy in 1990 for a device+system that #1 attracts lightning so it can #2 glean electricity from induction energy. You see, a magnetic megawave comes off a lightning bolt if it skinnies down a metal pole (lightning rod). So if a field of these lightning attraction poles were set up in Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi and perhaps Alabama, fully ONE-HALF of America's Electricity Needs could have been supplied by LIGHTNING. You don't have it right? Well, it isn't for lack. You've been had.

While it is true that we never know where lightning will strike, had the "powers that be" had the vision to understand & approve my system, orchard fields of these towers would now be attracting & feeding the capacitor-stored energy into large banks of smaller capacitors to be later sequentially released (as a timed-AC current) during Daytime Peak Energy Usage hours. The so-called "Lightning Belt States" are a natural resource and we have ignored it... Well, I didn't.

So, now here today in 2005 you're
being told we need a "New Manhattan Project"?
That's a LIE. It has been a lie since 1990.   

I also designed a machine to harness Gravity but it only works in Greenland or wherever the geomagnetic north pole happens to be this year. In 1990 it was near Thule Greenland but it moves around. So for those reasons I never promoted it. It is an interesting machine but for widespread energy needs, it's only useful to Greenlanders. Just as every one of my inventions since 1990 has been useless TO YOU. I have told the right people, submitted paperwork over these past 16 YEARS, yet we have LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE saying the Sky is Falling! & that just is not true! You have been scammed & lied to for a very, very long time. The Sky is not falling because God is there! It can't fall because He says it won't fall again after Noah. The people telling you we're out of electric power or energy are telling you wrong. Why? hahaha They want more billions of taxpayer dollars, that's why.

THERE'S A GASOLINE CRISIS?! 
Why ??? I solved that in 2003.  
Who am I??? I'm the one-man Manhattan Project.

In 1980 Dr. Harold Boese solved it. His converted Ford Pinto ran on compressed air. In 1997 Dr. Abraham Hertzberg solved the gasoline issue once more with yet another air-powered engine system! AND YOU DON'T HAVE IT? well, the truth is both those men didn't finish off gasoline as they made a few mistakes but in 2003 I FOUND THEM & THEIR ENGINES... FIXING THEM TO WORK EXTREMELY WELL LIKE A SWISS CLOCK.

And you haven't heard of me? Why is that?
THAT, Independence Day Will Smith, is the I, Robot question.

I submitted the fixes for the air-powered engines to the Department of Energy. They gave them the selfsame stamp they have been giving me since 1990 my friends; they never quit, they never give up, much like Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator; they never stopped saying No to my ideas, my plans, my systems. I have been a one-man Think Tank since 1989 while YOU and your families have been suffering like the Sky actually was falling. Now, today, you live as a rat not a man, not a woman, a rat. You scurry about your days thinking the World is Ending and it is <Ecclesiastes 1:4> NOT.

WHEN GOD GETS READY TO  
BRING THE SYSTEM DOWN
HE FIRST TELLS US.   

From 1985 til 2004 I pursued a logical path. I believed that us -the puny earthlings- had at our command all the power we need, all the power we could stand, more power than any of us could ever use in a thousand lifetimes, coming to us naturally every single day. In 2003 when I figured how to fix the air-powered engine, I knew the Department of Energy had their big fat liar NO stamp waiting for me. hahaha But, I sent it in to them anyway because I'm incorrigible & I do not give up easily. Besides, people do retire. Well, they gave it their NO stamp so I started writing like a banshee. For the past 2+ years since August 27, 2003, I have been writing of my gasoline-less, fossil fuel-free, non-polluting powerhouse car engine. I called my new website new path 4 as I was, in fact, opening a new path that was not filled with brier bushes & snakes so thick the rabbits wouldn't go.

YOU STILL DO NOT HAVE IT!
THAT'S RIGHT, RAT. WE'RE ALL
S.O.B.S.RATS NOW.

We have less value than a Chesspiece, the pawn. If you've played Chess you know what I'm saying. We are at the mercy & discretion of every other Chess piece. My engine is light, strong, powerful. It replaces gasoline and again I say to you: There is no shortage for energy. A 1968 VW Beetlebug weighed 1350 pounds; a new hybrid weighs double that & up. That's why it has to have two engines! And that's why you are paying for two cars.

Is MORE the answer? No. Smarter is better than harder! http://www.newpath4.com/enginewow.htm

The answers being given you by the "Master Chess Pieces" is not the only answer nor the best answer. It's the answer they want you to swallow, the answer that gets more of YOUR MONIES IN THEIR POCKET. The answer Dr. Abraham Hertzberg -eminent scientist, eminent aeronautics engineer, eminent aerospace engineer- gave you in 1997 is the answer you should have now. Someone should have fixed it before a highschool graduate like myself stumbled along & did it! The car engines & systems being fed to you first have to pass the "Does it cost enough? test". Then you get whatever solution is best for their bank account balance not the best for the ecology or environment, not the best for you or your family or Sister Sara's mules; you get what's best for them.

Sounds brutal eh? Truth stands alone. I don't have to prop it up.

Friends, all this is now Past History. What is done is done, water over the dam, river under the bridge, done & over with for me. Moving on, this year it occurred to me that perpetual motion is not the evil unachievable Devil-only domain some say it is. We see it all the time. Our solar system is one example. However, most scientists swear on a stack of Bibles (or Darwin's Origen of the Species) that perpetual motion is impossible. Let me clarify this issue a bit. Perpetual Motion is a "side effect" of Perpetual Power. Perp motion isn't something you try to make. It's something that just HAPPENS as a result of a perpetually active machine, engine. Our solar system is just that such an engine.

Perpetual Power? What is THAT?! More to the point:
CAN WE MAKE IT? <> CAN WE TAP INTO IT

Yes. The last 16 years of my believing in this -the impossible God-answer- being possible & probable has resulted in a device that makes more electricity output than the energy it consumes to run. You don't have it either. I am convinced that if I shoveled it over to the Department of "Energy", 16 years from now you still would not have it. Not any more than you have Dr. Hertzberg's completed engine nor Boese' nor the fields of lightning towers/systems. The Department of Energy is "owned by the house" and I know you gamblers out there recognize that true saying. "The House" makes the profits, you go home empty pockets.

It is not funny anymore if it ever was

Anyway, you are being sold the Biggest "Bill of Goods" in the History of the Human Species. You're doing without for gasoline we no longer "need", doing without heat this coming Winter 2005. But, much more than that, much more, is that you feel like an energy rat, an egg sucking energy wastrel and chaff! Why do you think people are killing their babies? Drowning them with mercy drownings in a car that rolls into a pond?! Let me splain. Rats do that. Cats eat their young sometimes. A female spider will eat its mate. Humans don't do those such things unless & until they find themselves & their children living inside an artificially-created "Sky is Falling" World. Then and only then will a person kill their children to send them to Heaven to be in a "better place".

God does not want your children that way.

Thousands of years ago men called "Prophets" foretold of a future world of plenty. Most have thought of that as a mirage, a dreamy oasis that does not exist nor ever will. I'm not a prophet. I'm just another guy living here alongside everyone else. As a child I was taught that God loves all the little children of the world. I believed it then, I believe it now. My belief in God & His desire to provide us our necessities of life has been my belief for 50 years. It was my football and I ran with it. In 1990, I crossed the "Goal Line" except the "powers that be" screamed it was a foul. In 2003, I once again crossed over the same goal line! Once again they screamed it was foul, denying it to both me and 280,000,000 (million) Americans!, 6+ billion of us all.

Methinks that's the only word they know! 

But they do understand the words "Crisis/Crises". They do understand there is a need for a "Manhattan Energy Project"-level solution. What they have failed to understand or acknowledge is that one guy has completed the Manhattan Energy Project IN TRIPLICATE. So some of you or all of you reading this page -hearing this for the first time- must truly be aghast at these things. Believe you me, I feel like I'm sitting at Ground Zero watching this go on for 16+ years.

KATRINA, RITA, INDIAN TSUNAMIS, HURRICANES 
PAKISTANI EARTHQUAKES.  NEW ORLEANS; DISASTER AFTERSHOCKS & AFTERMATH. MUDSLIDES OF MUD, MUDSLIDES OF LIFE.

This last engine I have made is a true miracle of motion. Like every engine, it does have negatives but the negatives are turned like a river to do Positive Work. Undoubtedly it still has a few negatives but they are miniscule. Both positive & negative motions are used to turn generators so it will run continuously -without fuel- creating a positive energy flow in the form of an electric current. It is what is called a "cyclical engine", runs in cycles that keeps on running til you turn it off. It isn't like a Model-T Ford to start either. There is no crank to turn to start it back running. Whenever you interrupt this engine to stop it, it stops fully charged for whenever you decide to turn it back on. The people who did not die in the actual disasters now await their death from lack of electricity. It is not God's Will to die as an afterthought, an aftermath collateral damage from a weather disaster. God loves us, wants us to prosper so we can learn more about Him. Hey, maybe even come to love Him. After all, He is God.

It is God's Engine, not mine; it's better than
weather energy
> turn it off, turn it on.

But... you cannot turn it off-on til I can get it to you. Obviously the Department of Energy is not on your side while the United States Patent Office says it will refuse to issue a Patent on any engine that does what this engine does. So I took my papers and animated gifs-on-a-disk over to the bank, rented a safety box & vaulted it for safekeeping til I figured out there's no escaping the 16-year maze. 

The Manhattan Project is finished but for the building.
God has provided you with something a whole lot better than Manna.
It comes through a guy on disability who lacks funds to beat the Chess Masters. The Scripture is proved true, that
if no one does God's Will He makes the rocks cry out:
Holy Bible: Luke 19 verse 40 

Even Stones & Rocks get tired of being told No.

The reason you are reading this is several. Mostly, my "opponents" the D.O.E. and the U.S.P.T.O. has underestimated me. They think I will cow down & shut up. hahaha  I've never shut up in my life, sure ain't now that I have seen how to make these engines: your engines, the gift from your God whether you recognize his Godhood or not. JHVH makes the rain fall on everyone. I say it but -much more importantly- the Scriptures have said it for 2, 3, 4, 5,000 years.

When is the last time you had to beg for rain? 

Global warming? Solved. Global pollution? Solved. Energy Crisis? Never existed; Solved. If they haven't been solved where you are then you're in rough shape.

 

November 26 is a Sabbath Day. I called it: Rain or Shine.
This World spins a whole lot better on November NOW '05.
It's going to be better than calling Dr. Stone.
Lack of electricity = a disease plague.
Time for Dr. Pasteur.

Who will be the Pasteur to crack these equations?:

Vapor .... Generator

 

.