UFO Tornado Rider

IF YOU haven't downloaded my book (Anti-Synergy: Project Badwater), you really should. It's a short novel. In its pages you will find a design for a UFO. It really would help you to understand my present design more easily if you had the novel "under your belt" before tackling the rest of this UFO page. But you don't have to.

What do you know about WINGS? Because of the shape of the wing, a plane can fly. The wing alters the air pressure. What do you know about hydrofoils?? They ride vertically on water? Water is a fluid. AIR IS A FLUID. Hhmmm. Hydrofoils and wings do different things. But what if we position some vertcal wings around the ship that are properly spaced (staggered) in such a way to do both the wing action of concentrating an inward air pressure under the craft (creating the "confining wall" the craft needs) yet also does the action of the hydrofoil by providing additional LIFT BECAUSE AT HIGH SPEEDS THE AIR MOLECULES CANNOT GET OUT OF THE WAY OF A SUPERHIGH-SPEED, REVOLVING, WIDE HYDROFOIL????

You're getting closer. You're hot! Can you guess the REST OF THE STORY? Alright let's move on. What do we need? A furnace blower? Upside down? Yes! The central power engine is a blower that pulls air from the top of the ship and exhausts it underneath. Our confining wall of air contains the heat JUST LONG ENOUGH TO HEAT THE UNDERSIDE OF THE SHIP. And the accumulating heat also provides lift. Sure, the air leaks out but not til after the heat lingers long enough to add 2 CENTS TO THIS EQUATION WE ARE SOLVING. IF WE JUST CAN ACCOMPLISH HOVERING IN ONE SPOT, then horizontal flight will be much easier. ONCE THE CRAFT picks up a horizontal speed to it the curved shape of the saucer will act like a wing in its own right!

There are 2 other factors involved but I'm running out of space and I'm determined not to write as long a page on this as I did on the Wind Engine. But basically what you have here is the whole ball of wax. I've shown you how to maximize the negatives that thwart UFO-like aircraft, changing lemons into flying lemonade. I don't want any Reader to think I'm trying to tease them by not saying the last 2 factors right away. I neither like being teased. The 2 other factors have to do mostly with stabilizing the craft anyway. Perhaps this isn't the time to throw all my cards into the wind. Not yet. Plus I've been writing other stuff all day and my hand is beginning to fuss. But the 99% theory I have shown you is enough for you to see that the 100 year anniversary of Kitty Hawk now stands marked by more than just winged aircraft on the agenda for future space flight. And that takes us to our next design, the engine design to power a ship into another solar system. And why it is superior to all the others you've had thrown at you so far in the media by "scientists" who know you might start to question their hold on your wallets unless they keep your head spinning so fast you lose track of the shell game they are masters at, and don't have the means to argue with their new toys. I'm here to argue for you, at AskInventor.

WHEN DID WE STOP SOAKING KNOWLEDGE LIKE A THIRSTY SPONGE? WHATEVER STOPPED US?? WHO GOT IN OUR WAY, WHAT TALL THE WALL? OR WAS IT JUST A SPEED BUMP?

SAUCER / UFO / FLYING WHATCHA_MA_CALL_IT ?

ASKINVENTOR - TRICKS 2 Extended 3

Imagine a round disk-like object in front of you. Or hold a saucer out before you. Now, what makes it fall if you let go? Of course the answer is gravity so most people think some fantastic new ANTI-GRAVITY device needs to be invented.

Well, that isn't quite right either! There IS NEED OF AN EQUALIZING FORCE THAT WOULD EQUAL THE PULL OF GRAVITY.... BUT ACTING IN AN UPWARD DIRECTION. It doesn't HAVE TO BE ANTI-GRAVITY. And of course since it's GRAVITY and we've been told all our LIFE THAT YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING WITH GRAVITY...

Look back at the saucer and imagine that above and below the saucer is like a circular Tower. Gravity pulls at the bottom of your saucer ship. What about the top? What's there? Whatever is there adds to the Gravity to accomplish holding everything down. There's what? 3 or 4 miles of ASSORTED AIR MOLECULES pushing down on the TOP AREA OF YOUR SHIP? NO WONDER YOU KEEP CRASHING.

Let's say your flying saucer is 20 feet across. The number of air molecules could be easily figured if I was A SCIENTIST. I'd input the molecular weights of the different gaseous components of air and multiply by their densities blah blah blah. HEY, I'm a Concept Engineer, not a scientist. Okay Mr. Not-A-Scientist, IF'n you can't figure it out HOW DO YOU KNOW IT WILL WORK?? Well, it's like this dear Reader. Imagine this. What do YOU think would happen if you could drop the vacuum down from outer space over top that saucer? I know what I think.

Of course, realistically that can't be done can it? What if a system could be designed to suck air from off the immediate top of the saucer fast enough to create a vacuum above it? What if the air being drawn away from the top WAS HEATED BY THE ENGINE (cooling the engine) and was blasted out the bottom? Would THAT do it? Would your saucer fly then??

I do not think so. But we've got a good starting point don't we friends? What makes this difficult is that perhaps you haven't been told that, under Laws of Physics, air is a fluid. And as such, air to have an upward pressure from being heated would have to be contained somehow under your saucer. Now YOU COULD DO THAT by having a wall extending down from the edges of the ship like the sides of a cup but what else would that do? Add weight? Yes. What about when your saucer tries to fly sideways. You might as well be flying a BORG SHIP then. It wouldn't go very fast. But we're still on the right track. If we want to build a hovercraft that flys on air as well as water, then there has got to be a MEANS OF CONFINING THE HEATED AIR.

I don't know how else to write this other than this question-answer format but I'm not trying to aggravate you on purpose. But this isn't a Wind Engine sitting on the ground. This is a craft that MUST RECOGNIZE EVERY RULE OF LAW HOLDING US ON THE GROUND... AND NEGATE THEM. So before I just spit out the answer I have to first define to you the scope of the problem. I know you have the patience for this because you apparently lived through that last giant page about the Wind Engine. It was a whopper wasn't it? You should give yourself a pat on the back! I hope you enjoyed it and Randy's 3d pix. My not being a scientist does have some decidedly negative sides. I have no wind tunnel or classes full of college students to build and test either my Wind Engine or my UFO. Which means I cannot actually PROVE TO YOU that my theory is right nor that the final product will do what I say. So it's more on the level of a Court of Law where a preponderance of evidence can get a suspected fellon to a death in a gas chamber or electric chair. Even if the Accused REALLY DIDN'T DO IT, a healthy mix of the true, the false, the evidence can get a body dead.