ICY HOT ? What happens in an icy hot engine ? [ 1 Icy2 Icy3 Icy4 Icy7]
I recently received a letter from someone who has difficulty with my steam enhanced nitrogen dual catalyst powerhouse engine. Seems he thinks the H2O molecules would turn to ice instead of dropping into a condensed state. My reply isn't short but it is complete:
You're correct. The moisture would ice immediately on contact. When the H2O molecules drop to ice the displacement will change inside the cylinder & the vacuum effect should be instantaneous. As the exchange continues between the nitrogen and steam, I expect a very fast metamorphosis to occur in both mediums & a transferring of energies between the 2 elements. Somewhere in the exchange of these wide heat values (Minus 320 vs 320 Plus) I expect the H2O to be de-iced. Full power can be had by straight - inject nitrogen, instead of expanding before introduction into the cylinder as the original LN2000 did do with its previous resulting power loss.
1) When the H2O drops 2 STATES DOWN, steam to ice, the vacuum created is going to be instantaneous.
2) The nitrogen will then be drawn into this vacuum at an even faster rate than the nitrogen would normally expand anyway in normal atmosphere.
3) Midway through all this near-instantaneous interaction the temperature differences will cancel out and the ice converts into water condensate.
Yes, I agree with the writer, and I thank him for being nice enough to state his objections. The molecule drops to ice then warms back to water well inside the blink of an eye. In Fact, the Speed of this new engine process is so FAST that it should either approach or surpass the Ignition power of gasoline. It is a flashpoint-level explosion without combustion just by mixing the proper stuff.
THE MOLECULAR LEVEL WHERE TINY IS LARGE
The H2O molecules would ice. The reduction in volume is what makes the vacuum so incredibly powerful. The nitrogen at 4,361 psi is going to expand anyway in a cylinder, the vacuum adds more of an inertial punch than an increase in speed. But there would definitely be an increase in overall piston-driving impact. I think what you were saying has a lot of truth. I think it needs saying that what we're talking about here is a near-instantaneous set of reactions that execute very fast. After the H2O molecule ices there proceeds to be a temperature exchange that brings the H2O from ice up to water condensate. What we have then is a cylinder filled with widely separated water that wants desperately to combine into a single friendly water droplet, or so I believe. I could be wrong on that, but I do know that cooled water molecules are going to want to condense WITH PASSION because of the dispersion of the cold nitrogen spray. However, whether the H2O combines naturally from molecular attraction or it simply drains out a drainhole periodically doesn't make much matter.
All these different things happening in a brief instant of time is going to far exceed the Speed of Sound at the PER MOLECULE LEVEL and as such will be creating a powerful thunderclap of energy (or a near-simultaneous group of thunderclaps) inside the cylinder. What this means is that the air inside the cylinder is going to be a tsunami piling into the piston head.
The other issue you raised is also correct. A larger cylinder would be needed to get enough steam inside. But there is a deeper issue. This engine is, unlike gasoline, a multi-level sequence of lightning fast actions that combine together to mimic gasoline. It isn't one single issue, the amount of steam, that will determine the final size of the cylinder. It's the necessary relationships between ALL the ingredients of this mix. A small cylinder isn't really small nor is the steam small as long as the nitrogen droplets are relatively even smaller.
There are so many different interactions and results of interactions that it's rather mind-boggling that I thought it up, Jim. Perhaps the engine is hard to understand because it's patterned after my scrambled brain. I am considered bipolar and I think in a cross-directional way. Most bipolar people can't deal with it but with advanced nutrition products I have harnessed that bipolar; the solution to the LN2000 nitrogen engine has been one of the results. My inventive abilities increased after I quit taking the Lithium that was holding my mood swings down by poisoning me. I have covered this on other of my pages.
Jim, I think synergistically. Many of my concepts are just groupings of little basics into a new kind of whole. So far, I've written about 117 webpages. My website covers many things, health advances, mental illnesses, and a lot of people just cannot deal with such a widespread website. Eventually I expect people to read JUST ONE THING they like, something that resonants with truth inside them, or something that helps them cope with life better. As those people begin to benefit I expect they will grow stronger Jim, mentally stronger, from reading my website. They will find their own particular Power, their Gifts that perhaps have not had someone like me to help them find them ...
In a sense I am building a web based city for people who come through my doors to leave feeling somehow better. They'll leave because turning their back on my information gives them a feeling of POWER, and we all need to feel that don't we Jim? But they'll come back also because they get to liking that feeling of KNOWING WHAT'S GOING ON instead of always being "kept in the dark" as is so often the case in today's world ...
As far as how much nitrogen vs. how much steam, ultimately the answer will lie in how many cold nitrogen molecules are crammed into a droplet of liquid nitrogen. Let's say there are 10 million. Perhaps only 10 thousand opposing H2O molecules would give us the vacuum-enhancement to make the engine work real well, so the cylinder would need to be designed large enough to import enough steam holding those 10 thousand molecules. I can reason these things out but as far as converting 10,000 molecules of steam H2O into how large a cylinder is required is something only you and a few others could do. I'm just the Inventor.
I understand that my concept is like some kind of crossfire express, so I spend lots of time trying to explain it. I can only offer that the nitrogen under pressure is like a self firing photon torpedo spread when it's injected into the cylinder. It spreads naturally from a single drop or 2, instantly breaking into a million little icy torpedoes. As this spreads, the little cold dots of nitrogen molecules go near or hit the hot H2O molecules, causing instantaneous collapse into ice on a molecular scale. But the combined effect of the many should make for creation of the few, the 1 instant cylinder-wide vacuum. The tsunami will begin at the head (injection) end and death roll towards the piston face with a devastating power. I should call this engine The Rolling Thunder Engine.
As I have mentioned on other of my pages, this is in essence a Black Hole-like collapse, an implosion of energy that draws the nitrogen even faster than it is already expanding. This is the hardest part to imagine, that the pull of the collapse is magnifying the expansive raw power of the nitrogen on 2 scales, the qualitative AND the quantitative. What we should see is an instantaneous expansion of 800:1 compressed gas; a WALLOP. A Chest blow. The sudden hit of the fastest karate master we could ever imagine times 10,000. It's as much destructive power here than in a Head On collision with a SEMI.
There's 2 kinds of power here:
1) The expansive power without steam is there, but without the steam the engine would freeze up.
2) The catalyst power from the interaction of properties to throw a Blast of force into the piston head.
Such
an engine doesn't need the cylinders to have the customary compression.
Not 8:1 of gas nor 22:1 of diesels.
The 2 different energies are creating its own combined reverse-compression inside the cylinder, a fuel-created cylinder compression substitute.
There are so many variables that need to be worked out. But you see, if the cylinder doesn't have its own compression then there is very little negative resistance to the engine's returning pistons! 97% of all the power is on the Plus Side.
So Jim, maybe you're right. Maybe my engine solution is less power than gasoline. But being 1 Cycle (each stroke a power stroke) instead of 4 Cycle (1 power stroke spread across 4 strokes) and not much compression holding the cylinders back, will result in a 500% to 1,500% Power Increase over a gasoline engine. End result?
This engine should Equal or Exceed the power of a Gasoline Engine.
You have permission to print this page.