1 thought on “Ruzhou Bringing Tycoon: Chen Zhiqiang!”
Christian
The word "revenge rich" in the Internet in recent years is definitely a popular label, and the high energy used in use is discussed with "beauty" and other words. The word "revenge rich" is not just the grass follows the commented that some experts and celebrities also come to rush to be lively. There are analysis reasons, some who act as vulnerable spokespersons, some sociologists are "correctly guided", the most famous is Lang Xianping’s There is also a speech by Sohu Zhang Chaoyang. Some academic expert Xu Youyu's exposed "peeling".
Thefu in our time, it is not a virtual existence. The huge reality gap makes this word have its facts and objectivity. No matter what the decoration is, whether it is in my heart or action, Qiu Fu is a true portrayal of today's Chinese society. The reason is extremely complicated. It is a big problem that is difficult to say in the context of society.
It some experts analyzed some truths. The root cause of Qiu rich lies in the irrationality of social distribution. Some people have a sense of loss. Of course, Qiu Fu has become the vent of anger of netizens. The word "Qiu Fu" has become a weapon for many netizens in blogs or forums. The true manifestation.
This of Lang Xianping, Zhang Chaoyang, Xu Youyu and other big names, no matter what the starting point is, the phenomenon of revenge and richness in China is actually the cry of the people's sullen voice. The frequent use of Qiu Fu's word also proves the fact that the rich and poor in China is disparity. Many hidden ITs will not speak false. Remember that in the 1980s, the individual households were real national policies and earned their own hard work to earn their own hard work. Money, the rich part of the people is the object of worship and the goal of catching up.
The in the mid -1990s. With the deepening of the reform, the changes in the wealth of the rich people in China have become increasingly colluding. In the development, the transactions with some corrupt elements with the government have reached the rapid wealth of those people. Some so -called experts talk about such a phenomenon is the market economy, which is progress, and serious upside down black and white things are insisted on the market economy.
laes of Lang Xianping said well: a normal society, there is no reason to blindly revenge the rich, but should "revenge". There are more and more people who are progressing in Chinese society, economic growth, and legal becoming rich. This is a good thing. Therefore, the social mentality must maintain an objective evaluation of the rich. However, we should resolutely fight for corruption forces, and everyone is responsible.
Xu Youyu said: The public is dissatisfied with corruption and injustice, and requires social justice and removing corruption. Of course, this is right. The real solution is to effectively remove corruption and achieve social justice.
The statement of Chaoyang: The Chinese are not wealthy, but revenge. On the surface, the Chinese people seem to be that wealth is actually not wealth. The Chinese are evil! But at this stage, the rich and wicked people have a relatively large overlap. And evil (great evil, great influence) is mainly concentrated in the rich area. So the evil seemed to be in the rich.
This China has differentiated into several classes. Various wealthy clubs are very eye -catching in each large and medium -sized cities. The wealthy club in China does not know how to gather money? Or talk about social responsibility? Anyway, there is no club in the poor. To speak, just leak the fire on the Internet.
The criminal cases exposed in recent years have indeed been implemented by the term "revenge". Since entering 2000, several wealthy people have fallen into a pool of blood: Li Haicang, billionaire in Shanxi; Zhou Zupeng, a rich man in Wenzhou, Zhejiang; Liu Enqian, Gansu Real Estate Tycoon Liu Enqian was killed; Ge Junming, Chairman of Sichuan Mingda Company was killed ... This is a long Long list of blood dripping. With the continuous growth of the list, the controversy about the "rich crime" and "the first bucket of gold and punishment" have intensified.
It critics pointed out that the current rich in China is not kind, keeps wealth without grace, has no sense of social responsibility, etc. I think the reason is not simple imagination. The selfishness of the rich in China is that wealth is the result of his (her) efforts, not concerned about the country's big policy, and the dedication of the people. The accumulation of wealth plunder the hard -earned by most people. CCTV is advocating the rich people to give back to the society every year, and the charity party has been engaged in several. I did not see a few rich people who took the initiative to come up with what kind of charity circle. Huo, it is necessary to get a sensation in making some charity.
The world seems to be able to escape the pattern of dividing into the poor and the rich. Even if all the poor are eliminated, there will be a group of poor people among the rich; Among the poor, the poor also inevitably produces the rich. The problem is not that there are always poor and rich in the world, but the contradiction between the poor and the rich. In a survival of the fittest, under the influence of Matthew effect, fierce competition always makes some people richer and richer, and the other people are getting poorer, which causes the problem of poor people and rich people.
The problem of poor people is the problem of survival, because they continue to poor, they even have the basic food that maintains life. If a person can't maintain his life, who can guarantee what he will do. The survival problem of the poor is then transformed into the logic of the poor: instead of starving, it is better to desperate with the rich. According to the logic of Chen Sheng, the originator of the Chinese peasant uprising, the logic of Chen Sheng is that it is to die anyway. The ultimate belonging of the poor problem is to move towards the violent revolution. At that time, it is difficult to guarantee the property and life of the rich.
The problem of rich people is property issues. The more wealth, the more we need to protect them. The only way to protect property is to use violence tools, such as military and police. And by having and using these violence tools, plundering wealth is easier to accumulate wealth than equal transactions. If the rich uses money to establish violence tools -form tyranny, and then use violence tools to make money, the poor of the poor are not guaranteed. In this case, the poor are not starved to death, and they will be threatened at the time of life under the tyranny of the rich.
The people come to this world and hope they have more wealth. However, wealth is only a means of life, not the purpose, and the purpose of life is to gain freedom. Imagine that if a person is extremely rich, and his surroundings are the poor people who are difficult to spend and dying in life, look at him with jealousy and hatred. For safety, the rich can only build around his luxury homes around his mansion. Iron fence, surround himself, except for the bodyguard, he can't go anywhere, so what does wealth bring to the rich? It is tired of wealth and is even more uncomfortable. The greatest freedom of the rich is that the poor are seen as "ordinary people". Like ordinary people, they can turn in the vegetable market and store without being noticed. They can run in the park without any safety concerns. Treat them equally.
The rich people need to create a social environment for themselves. When they continuously donate, fulfill their human rights commitments to the poor, obtain the respect and peaceful treatment of the poor, and eliminate the seeds of the society's jealousy and hatred of the rich, they can truly enjoy the freedom brought by wealth. When the human rights and property rights contracts maintain a dynamic balance in society, people have lost the motivation of violent violence, and society can take long for a long time, and everyone can enjoy life calmly.
The word "revenge rich" no matter how it evolves, there are fewer poor people, and the rich people are righteous. The system is fair. The existence of this word is meaningless.
The word "revenge rich" in the Internet in recent years is definitely a popular label, and the high energy used in use is discussed with "beauty" and other words. The word "revenge rich" is not just the grass follows the commented that some experts and celebrities also come to rush to be lively. There are analysis reasons, some who act as vulnerable spokespersons, some sociologists are "correctly guided", the most famous is Lang Xianping’s There is also a speech by Sohu Zhang Chaoyang. Some academic expert Xu Youyu's exposed "peeling".
Thefu in our time, it is not a virtual existence. The huge reality gap makes this word have its facts and objectivity. No matter what the decoration is, whether it is in my heart or action, Qiu Fu is a true portrayal of today's Chinese society. The reason is extremely complicated. It is a big problem that is difficult to say in the context of society.
It some experts analyzed some truths. The root cause of Qiu rich lies in the irrationality of social distribution. Some people have a sense of loss. Of course, Qiu Fu has become the vent of anger of netizens. The word "Qiu Fu" has become a weapon for many netizens in blogs or forums. The true manifestation.
This of Lang Xianping, Zhang Chaoyang, Xu Youyu and other big names, no matter what the starting point is, the phenomenon of revenge and richness in China is actually the cry of the people's sullen voice. The frequent use of Qiu Fu's word also proves the fact that the rich and poor in China is disparity. Many hidden ITs will not speak false. Remember that in the 1980s, the individual households were real national policies and earned their own hard work to earn their own hard work. Money, the rich part of the people is the object of worship and the goal of catching up.
The in the mid -1990s. With the deepening of the reform, the changes in the wealth of the rich people in China have become increasingly colluding. In the development, the transactions with some corrupt elements with the government have reached the rapid wealth of those people. Some so -called experts talk about such a phenomenon is the market economy, which is progress, and serious upside down black and white things are insisted on the market economy.
laes of Lang Xianping said well: a normal society, there is no reason to blindly revenge the rich, but should "revenge". There are more and more people who are progressing in Chinese society, economic growth, and legal becoming rich. This is a good thing. Therefore, the social mentality must maintain an objective evaluation of the rich. However, we should resolutely fight for corruption forces, and everyone is responsible.
Xu Youyu said: The public is dissatisfied with corruption and injustice, and requires social justice and removing corruption. Of course, this is right. The real solution is to effectively remove corruption and achieve social justice.
The statement of Chaoyang: The Chinese are not wealthy, but revenge. On the surface, the Chinese people seem to be that wealth is actually not wealth. The Chinese are evil! But at this stage, the rich and wicked people have a relatively large overlap. And evil (great evil, great influence) is mainly concentrated in the rich area. So the evil seemed to be in the rich.
This China has differentiated into several classes. Various wealthy clubs are very eye -catching in each large and medium -sized cities. The wealthy club in China does not know how to gather money? Or talk about social responsibility? Anyway, there is no club in the poor. To speak, just leak the fire on the Internet.
The criminal cases exposed in recent years have indeed been implemented by the term "revenge". Since entering 2000, several wealthy people have fallen into a pool of blood: Li Haicang, billionaire in Shanxi; Zhou Zupeng, a rich man in Wenzhou, Zhejiang; Liu Enqian, Gansu Real Estate Tycoon Liu Enqian was killed; Ge Junming, Chairman of Sichuan Mingda Company was killed ... This is a long Long list of blood dripping. With the continuous growth of the list, the controversy about the "rich crime" and "the first bucket of gold and punishment" have intensified.
It critics pointed out that the current rich in China is not kind, keeps wealth without grace, has no sense of social responsibility, etc. I think the reason is not simple imagination. The selfishness of the rich in China is that wealth is the result of his (her) efforts, not concerned about the country's big policy, and the dedication of the people. The accumulation of wealth plunder the hard -earned by most people. CCTV is advocating the rich people to give back to the society every year, and the charity party has been engaged in several. I did not see a few rich people who took the initiative to come up with what kind of charity circle. Huo, it is necessary to get a sensation in making some charity.
The world seems to be able to escape the pattern of dividing into the poor and the rich. Even if all the poor are eliminated, there will be a group of poor people among the rich; Among the poor, the poor also inevitably produces the rich. The problem is not that there are always poor and rich in the world, but the contradiction between the poor and the rich. In a survival of the fittest, under the influence of Matthew effect, fierce competition always makes some people richer and richer, and the other people are getting poorer, which causes the problem of poor people and rich people.
The problem of poor people is the problem of survival, because they continue to poor, they even have the basic food that maintains life. If a person can't maintain his life, who can guarantee what he will do. The survival problem of the poor is then transformed into the logic of the poor: instead of starving, it is better to desperate with the rich. According to the logic of Chen Sheng, the originator of the Chinese peasant uprising, the logic of Chen Sheng is that it is to die anyway. The ultimate belonging of the poor problem is to move towards the violent revolution. At that time, it is difficult to guarantee the property and life of the rich.
The problem of rich people is property issues. The more wealth, the more we need to protect them. The only way to protect property is to use violence tools, such as military and police. And by having and using these violence tools, plundering wealth is easier to accumulate wealth than equal transactions. If the rich uses money to establish violence tools -form tyranny, and then use violence tools to make money, the poor of the poor are not guaranteed. In this case, the poor are not starved to death, and they will be threatened at the time of life under the tyranny of the rich.
The people come to this world and hope they have more wealth. However, wealth is only a means of life, not the purpose, and the purpose of life is to gain freedom. Imagine that if a person is extremely rich, and his surroundings are the poor people who are difficult to spend and dying in life, look at him with jealousy and hatred. For safety, the rich can only build around his luxury homes around his mansion. Iron fence, surround himself, except for the bodyguard, he can't go anywhere, so what does wealth bring to the rich? It is tired of wealth and is even more uncomfortable. The greatest freedom of the rich is that the poor are seen as "ordinary people". Like ordinary people, they can turn in the vegetable market and store without being noticed. They can run in the park without any safety concerns. Treat them equally.
The rich people need to create a social environment for themselves. When they continuously donate, fulfill their human rights commitments to the poor, obtain the respect and peaceful treatment of the poor, and eliminate the seeds of the society's jealousy and hatred of the rich, they can truly enjoy the freedom brought by wealth. When the human rights and property rights contracts maintain a dynamic balance in society, people have lost the motivation of violent violence, and society can take long for a long time, and everyone can enjoy life calmly.
The word "revenge rich" no matter how it evolves, there are fewer poor people, and the rich people are righteous. The system is fair. The existence of this word is meaningless.